Wednesday 10 August 2011

London's Burning, London's Burning! Fire, Fire! Fire, Fire!

As violence rolled across our Capital city, chilling words were uttered by an LBC listener from Sydney, “London, the world is watching.”

Groups of youths and adults rolled through London's streets for four nights, attacking shops and setting buildings and cars ablaze. The reason? An alleged drug dealer was shot by police. That's what purportedly started this horrific event. A man, Mark Duggan, was shot in Tottenham. The locals protested and marched on the local police station on Saturday night and the mayhem spread from there.

For Londoners, we suffered the worst of it on Monday 8th August, 2011, with police overwhelmed by the sheer number of ‘disaffected’ youths. Thankfully, the fourth night, 9th August, stayed mostly quiet in London, with minor disturbances reported in Canning Town, Crouch End, Highgate and Muswell Hill.

Saturday night alone, £100 million of damage was done. With the economy in as much trouble as it is, this is disastrous. Homes, family businesses and lives were destroyed. A furniture shop in Croydon, Reeves’ Corner, stood for over a century, it survived two world wars. And it was destroyed by its own community. These monsters destroyed the lives of those whom they live with with their brutality.

Now, let's get political: Should the Prime Minister, David Cameron, have returned sooner? That's debatable. What was there that he could have done to stop this? Very little, I would say. It was the job of the police to get the situation under control, which they eventually did. The furore of these monsters had to burn out, as did shops, cars and homes. Had Mr. Cameron returned earlier, it would have heightened the sense of emergency. As would calling in the army. As would declaring a 'state of emergency'.

The Chancellor’s return, however, did inject some much needed mirth, with many mockingly saying “Don’t worry, George Osborne’s coming back!”

What infuriates me, is the social workers, the youth workers, going on television, the radio, and saying that it’s because of government cuts, youth programmes being cancelled. My youth group was cut, all but closed, yet I wasn’t out there terrorising these people. Nor were any other of its members. They were the ones out there yesterday, today, cleaning up the streets after this travesty. These people may have hard lives, they may be bored on hot summer’s nights but that is no excuse.

In Croydon, Enfield, Lewisham and Southall, groups of residents banded together to protect their communities. They stood up to thugs and protected their homes and families. That is part of the beauty of London. That is what makes me proud to be British.

Carnage was wrought in: Bethnal Green, Birmingham, Bristol, Brixton, Bromley, Camden, Clapham, Croydon, Ealing, East Ham, Enfield, Hackney, Islington, Kensington High Street, Liverpool, Manchester, Notting Hill, Nottingham, Oxford Circus, Peckham, Poinders End, Salford, Sloane Square, Tottenham, Waltham Forest, West Bromwich and Woolwich. There may be more that I have missed, however, I hope not.

Minor trouble was reported and quickly stopped in Glasgow, I believe, but was quickly averted. The Scottish police said they were ready to help if their English counterparts needed it. Luckily, the trouble stayed, for the most part, in England and did not spread to other parts of the U.K..

My thoughts are with those areas outside of London still affected, those who woke up to chaos, those in anyway harmed by this carnage. And with our wonderful Policemen.

This week’s title, somewhat childish. Although, my six year old niece didn’t know it. Also a bit flippant. The prizes are getting better though.



1 comment:

  1. Dear Prime Minister,

    (E-mailed to No10 today 6-9-2011)

    I am a 75 yr old pensioner and with growing dismay I have observed via the TV screen long queues at job centres of job seekers many of whose scruffy appearance would deter most employers from offering them employment. I include the widespread unsavoury fashion of designer stubble, grubby trainers, crumpled jeans, and shrunken tee shirts; unhelpful and almost guaranteed to be off putting for employers and their customers.

    I’m curious to know whether the word voluntary would be appropriate when applied to a sort of national non-military conscription scheme intended to instil the discipline of the long forgotten work ethic into the long term unemployed masses of the United Kingdom?

    I believe such a scheme is still in its tentative planning stage, but certain hints have been revealed in the media as to how it would affect the unemployed individual. For example:

    If this individual is offered and refuses employment, and also rejects further education and/or work experience courses, and then refuses to volunteer to be conscripted into the proposed scheme, then for this reluctant individual the receipt of all Social Security and Council Benefits would cease. What happens then? Is this individual to be turned out like a vagrant onto the street to beg for a living? Shall the British public be forbidden to offer sustenance to this individual, and would, ‘not volunteering’ become an offence qualifying for imprisonment? If one reluctant individual is multiplied to become thousands of reluctant individuals do you forsee the time when internment camps would be needed to house the growing numbers?

    In short have the possible traumatic effects of this scheme been thought through to their logical conclusion?

    Best wishes from

    David Brittain

    22 Thorns Way

    Walton on the Naze

    Essex CO14 8SB

    Tel No: 01255 672132

    david_brittain@talktalk.net

    www.ascensionsupportteam.com

    ReplyDelete